<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" href="/rssmgr/xsl.xml" type="text/xsl"  media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<channel>
<title>
<![CDATA[Google's Shared Stuff, etc.]]>
</title>
<link>
http://www.newfangled.com/google_shared_stuff
</link>
<pubDate>
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:26 -0500
</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:26 -0500
</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>
<![CDATA[January 21, 2008 1:55 PM]]>
</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[This kind of thing frustrates me. Why does Google need to do this. Hasn't del.icio.is proven their dominance in this area? I think this is the kind of thing that frustrates a lot of W2.0 novices.]]>
</description>
<link>
http://www.newfangled.com/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/8043#comment11907
</link>
<pubDate>
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:55:23 -0500
</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>
<![CDATA[January 22, 2008 8:38 AM]]>
</title>
<description>
<![CDATA[Mark, I agree. I think Google has a lot of development going on at once, and they're relying upon early adopters to clue them in to which projects they should continue as apposed to replace with acquisitions. Kind of a 'buy or build' approach that we're familiar with. In the meantime, it leaves us with some definitely 'in progress' stuff like the 'shared stuff' tool.]]>
</description>
<link>
http://www.newfangled.com/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/8043#comment11906
</link>
<pubDate>
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:38:24 -0500
</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>



</rss>