BLOG | APRIL, 2010 Week 749by Christopher I missed week 748, which works out because there wasn't much I would have written in the weeknote anyway. This week, 749, was a busy one, so I'm going to do the weeknotes in pictures...
On TUESDAY, we had our weekly developer conference. Above, from left, are Mike, Steve, and Jim—who joined us via Google Video Chat from our Providence office—offscreen are Dave and I. We spent some time reviewing everyone's current projects and workload and then discussed a chapter of The Pragmattic Programmer, the book the group is currently reading through.
On WEDNESDAY, I saw this car parked near our office and laughed. The owner must be pretty enthusiastic about the internet. No, this is not my car.
THURSDAY was Mike Boulet's 10 year anniversary! I put up this banner to celebrate him in traditional Rhode Island dialect. But seriously, decade-long tenures at companies like ours are truly remarkable today for a couple of reasons. The first is that most companies like ours just aren't that old! We've been around since 1995—a very long time by web standards. The other is that it's not as common these days for employees to remain at a company that long. But we have Dave, Jim, Steve Brock, Mike, Justin and Mark, who have all been with Newfangled for a decade this year. That's just amazing to me (I can't believe I'll have been here for six years in September...). Days like Thursday remind me how thankful I am for these guys and the years of service they've offered to our company.
SATURDAY: Yes, I bought an iPad! Several of us 'Fangleders went down to Best Buy early on Saturday morning, expecting a long line after being tipped off by Brian's contacts at the store. It turned out that the line was almost nonexistant until about 9:30—a half-hour before they opened. But, thanks to Brian, we were first in line and able to get one of the 15 iPads the store had. I'm very impressed with it. For starters, I got over 48 hours of use out of it before I needed to charge the battery. I didn't run constant video or anything like that, just what I anticipate will be normal use for me. Very cool. By the way, I don't have an iPhone or iPod touch, so the touch and apps experience is entirely new to me. Everything looks amazing on it—video, iTunes, web pages, books, etc. The experience I'm most impressed by is the iBooks application. I had low expectations/interest in it, but after using it quite a bit already it has quickly become the aspect of the iPad I find most compelling—ease of use, aesthetic experience, quality, etc. I'm sure I'll have more to say about it in the coming weeks, but for now, I think it's great, am sure it will be very popular, and otherwise agree with everything Walter Mossberg said about it in his review for the Wall Street Journal. |
"'Fangleders" is pretty 'kward, if you ask me.
Great. More iPad hype.Thought you'd be more discerning. Read this: http://www.socialtimes.com/2010/04/why-im-returning-my-apple-ipad-appl/
What are you going to use the iPad for ?
Who is going to buy the iPad ?
Apparently iPad is intended for the rest of us.
Problem: most of the rest of us have a foreclosure home. They won't buy an iPad.
iPod and iPhone are social gadgets: to show off with.
Problem: iPad is intended to use at home: nobody sees it. No show off value.
Hello Chris,
Recieved an email today from Nuance which might be of interest to a new iPad user. If you are not familiar with Nuance, it makes dictation and document processing software. I have been using their Dragon Naturally Speaking dictation software under Windows for several years, and have found it to work well for me. Nuance are now offering Dragon Dictation for iPad. Much as I like DNS for desktop PC's, I should think mobile versions might equally or perhaps more helpful for users of mobile devices equipped with virtual rather than mechanical keyboards, especially for email and other composition tasks in the field. At present, it is available as a free download from the Apple App Store. See www.dragonmobileapps.com/index.html for more information.
Tio
Even though the iPad received a good amount of attention and may indeed be "hyped" up. Established businesses are taking that hype seriously and coming up with competitive products : http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/fortune/1003/gallery.ipad_competitors.fortune/index.html
Also, it is a bit early to make such a harsh judgment call on a new product. The US has been known to create the product and then the apps, not think of the apps then the product. The uses for this product will become more realized as more apps targeting the iPad become available.
Jillian: Yeah, I hear you, but that's what it is...
Ted: I read that, and I can understand the author's point of view. BUT, I'm not going to be sucked in to feeling bad about my purchase for two reasons: (1) I don't already have an iPhone, so that argument is lost on me. I really don't like cellphones—never have—so I was not motivated to get an iPhone despite the fanfare. (2) I'm about as ascetic as you can get these days, so any purchase I do make is pretty thoroughly considered. In this case, I wanted to own at least one web-kit enabled device so that my decision making at Newfangled in regard to mobile development would be informed. The iPad or iPod touch are the only non-phone webkit devices. Since I already have an iPod, getting a touch would not make sense. The iPad, on the other hand, offered a look into another kind of device entirely, one that, since focused heavily on reading, suits me quite well.
Alan: I think most of my response to Ted would apply here as well, however, buying a device purely for "show off value" is about as foolish as you can get. And frankly, I'm no Apple fanboy, but I'm pretty sure Apple is not dumb enough to create a product and hope people will buy it solely as a status symbol.
Uncle Tio: I will check that out right away. I'm very interested in parallel computing right now, and haven't heard of many dictation tools that are really stable/effective. Thanks for the tip!
Brian: I completely agree. It is far too early. At this point, I'm confident that even if the iPad specifically is a failure, the concept in general will not be.
Everyone: I just added a new blog post with some thoughts on fractured vs. focused attention on the iPad.