Online Advertising Redux
![]()
|
Reviewing the recent history of Google
Google was once merely a search engine. For years it focused ruthlessly on its core functionality--the math that drove the algorithm, which produced the most relevant search results. Their success produced all the traffic they could handle. But they didn’t sell anything. Then in 2002, it happened. Keyword based text ads stated appearing along the right column of search results. Suddenly lots of traffic was becoming lots of revenue. Shortly thereafter the Google AdWords program enabled advertisers to run almost instant campaigns using Google's self-serve, no-minimum bid, max-spend-per-day system. Google was quietly building up incredible profits, but exactly how much nobody knew--at least not until Google went public in August of 2004. (Images to the left show Google's growth since then and they just announced 63% profit on $3.66 billion in revenue, exceeding industry expectations again for the first quarter of 2007.) Once the world got its eyes on the unbelievable profits of Google AdWords, the wheels of online commerce began turning at rates unseen since the dot-com bubble era. But this time the bubble isn't full of gas; it's full of cash.
Google is still an excellent search engine, but as far as the kind of company it is, it's no longer merely a search engine. It's more like a media giant. Case in point: their recent announcement of the $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick. Clearly Google is committed to maintaining their dominance as an online media machine. Oddly, its transformation into a media company is part of the reason they are having problems with both their $1.8 billion acquisition of YouTube and their copyright challenges regarding their book search feature. As a neutral search tool, indexing and retrieving data helps everyone and nobody would take a second look at their service. But with scads of cash in play, suddenly their marginally legal practices regarding storing of electronic copies of copyrighted materials no longer feels entirely neutral.
All that to say...
I review Google's history to emphasize how big online advertising is and how fast its growing. The thing that amazes me about Google’s AdWords program (as well as Yahoo! and MSN's advertising networks) is that, as big as they are, anyone with the smallest of ad budgets can easily participate. Just fill out a couple web forms and within minutes you're posting ads alongside search results. I’ve written about Online Advertising with Google AdWords and the basics covered in that newsletter are still the same. But there are new features, players and practices to review. next >
Comments 
|
|
January 6, 2008 5:06 AM Can also give keywordspy a try.KeywordSpy.com is a Keyword Research Tool that helps identify what keywords competitors use, with results actually reflecting what advertisers are using at the current time. - http://www.keywordspy.com |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:15 PM Keywordspy Scam Alert! Firstly I do believe the concept to use such a service is great. Finding out what my competitors are doing is really a good idea. Unfortunately the way KeywordSpy go about it just doesn’t cut it for me. Firstly what made me signup was the fact that I could see all the keywords my competitors were using. This is great in theory, but after I signed up I found that most of the keywords many of my competitors were using were rubbish. It seems that all my |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:24 PM my competitors were using were rubbish. It seems that all my competitors were using keywords that were not working for them. After I signed up I found that over 2/3 of the keywords I received from my competitors were useless. Secondly I decided to signup was to find the keywords with little competition. Sure they supply these but out of the few that were actually related to my industry, the analysis was way out of date. All the keywords that Keywordspy said only had 1 competitor |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:25 PM really had at least four. And the final reason for never touching Keywordspy, is they recurring charges. As a merchant I feel it is the customer’s choice weather to stay, this does not apply for Keywordspy. I only wanted to test it for the first month, so three weeks later I logged on to cancel my account. THERE IS NOT AUTOMATED WAY TO DO THIS! Here is the email I received.. Dear xxxxxx, We regret to hear that you want to cancel your account with us. |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:25 PM To cancel your subscription, please click the link below and follow the KeywordSpy Subscription Cancellation procedures: We will process your cancellation upon receipt of the Subscription Cancellation Form. Please note that cancellation request cycle normally takes 3-5 working days to complete. We wish to join you again in the near future as we continue to include and integrate more features in our system. Please feel free to contact us if yo |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:26 PM u have any additional questions. Sincerely, KeywordSpy Support I have to fax them a copy of a form which is available on their website. The issue with this, it has to be faxed and can take 2-5 working days. Even if I was to fax my application across I would run out of time and be billed for next month. I am unsure of the law on this but shouldn’t the consumer have the right to email KeywordSpy and ask to have their billing authority revoked? A |
|
|
May 12, 2008 8:26 PM After all this I declined to fax the form and contacted my bank. They told me to send an email to KeywordSpy stating that they no longer have any authority to bill my card. If they bill me again my bank will create an investigation causing a chargeback to Keywordspy, I am very disappointed with this and believe that the consumer has the right to choose, not to be forced into a silly scheme intended to cost even more. |
|
|
August 31, 2008 10:13 PM lmao ur such a stupid cunt |












Share
DIIGO