NEWSLETTERS | JUNE, 2010 Storytelling is the Future of the WebIn This Article
![]() Storytelling is the Future of the WebMost of the successful marketing campaigns that stand out in my memory all revolve around characters. Some of them are simply charismatic spokespeople, like Geico's gecko, Nationwide's "Greatest Spokesperson in the World, or, I suppose, Burger King's creepy king. Others keenly represent the intended customer—think way back to Wendy's "where's the beef?" lady, or more recently to Apple's mac and PC guys. In all of these cases, it was decided that a more compelling message could be created by using characters to tell a story, rather than putting the product itself front and center. Relating to characters and their stories is essential in order for people to make an initial connection with brands. Sure, some brands eventually transcend the need for connection and become themselves defining characteristics of people. In fact, Apple's "I'm a mac/pc" was somewhat self-referential in that way. But in the beginning, people need to connect with a story in order to believe that a product or service matters to them. Of course, this isn't news. This has been established marketing thinking for a very long time. But somehow, the concept of storytelling doesn't seem to have worked its way down from the worldwide mega-brands to the next tier of businesses in which you and I work. But why shouldn't it? After all, we're endeavoring to speak to the very same people they are! This month I'd like to explore storytelling, dispel the myth that we can't tell stories on the web, and identify some ways we can hone our craft as web-based storytellers. Telling Stories, Capturing AttentionWe've heard quite a bit over the past few years about how the web has changed the way we read, even the way we think. In particular, the often publicized worry is that the change has been a negative one—that we no longer read deeply, and that we can no longer focus our thinking as we did before. There are plenty of voices in dissent on this opinion, though they don't tend to dispute the fact that the web has changed us rather than the judgement that said change is for the worse. As a result, those of us in the digital marketing space are caught up in a quite tumultuous time, seeking out any trick we can find to get people to pay attention to our messages online. But I don't think there is any "trick" to be discovered. While I may personally worry about the effects of the web on our brains, the reality seems to be that we do not actually have an attention problem. The problem lies in our failure to imbue marketing with information worth paying attention to. What We Pay Attention ToNo matter what happens with the web, people still fervently seek out entertainment. Every year, more books, television shows, movies, music and the like are created and voraciously consumed. But if that is the case, why do we believe this idea that the web has killed our attention? Perhaps the volume of content is increasing but the demands it makes on our attention spans are less? (In other words, is it possible that the web is helping us to create and sell more books, for example, that people aren't actually reading?) I decided to take a closer look at the books, movies, and television we've consumed over the past twenty years to see if a clearer picture of what's happening might emerge.1
One other aspect of this data fascinated me. You'll notice that there is a gap where data from 2008 should be. It turns out that one of the most popular fiction series of all time, the Harry Potter saga, completely disrupted the publishing industry's measuring practices such that 2008 remains unquantifiable. Initially, the Harry Potter books' sales were recorded in a category devoted to juvenile literature. However, it quickly became apparent that the Harry Potter books were transcending that category. Though it's known that the sales from this franchise eclipse the sales of any other fiction over the last decade, they've been weeded out of the available statistics because of the categorical disagreement. Put simply, if the Harry Potter books were included in the above graph, the length of the best-selling fiction books would be overwhelmingly increasing over time, indicating that reader attention has been consistently captivated by their story. I say "story" rather than "stories" intentionally, because the Harry Potter series is one very long story, told over several books. The reader's perseverance over the seven books published so far, enjoying a story arc written across thousands of pages (note the increasing thickness of the Potter books themselves in the graph above right), demonstrates an unprecedented dedication of attention. In other words, people are still reading—apparently, more than ever.
Next, I decided to look at film and television industry data from the same perspective. Anecdotally, my sense was that movies were getting longer, but I couldn't really be sure (perhaps that's only true of the movies I watch). So, I gathered the top-grossing movies and the top-rated television programs from the past 20 years and looked specifically at their length. Like the top-selling books, the top-grossing movies and television programs are getting longer. The television statistics intrigued me in particular. In the years between 1990 and 2000, half-hour sitcoms often received the highest ratings. These shows tended to tell stories that were resolved at the conclusion of each episode, allowing viewers to engage with them easily. However, the popular programs of the last decade have been ones that require more from the viewer. With dramas, one-hour programs with season-length (or longer) story arcs have been more popular. Consider how Lost strung viewers along for 6 years promising resolution to one epic mystery. However, the highest-rated program of the last decade has been American Idol, a reality show. With reality programming, the story is even more personal. Viewers watch as contestants develop over the course of weeks, getting to know them and care about them, and all the more so with those that continue to compete as the show closes in on its finale. Reality shows tell stories that matter to viewers in an even more potent way than fiction in that their subtexts offer a new kind of fairy tale—one that many truly believe could be true for them. That, in a nutshell, is the holy grail of marketing: creating a story that is just out of reach enough to be compelling to people, yet just plausible enough to merit them pursuing it. If nothing else, American Idol demonstrates an extremely effective modern marketing model (how I wish we could do the same with things more wholesome than celebrity, but that's another column...). We Pay Attention to StoriesIt's clear from the book, film, and television data that we do not have an attention problem. The common thread here is the power of the story. People want to be told stories, and clearly have an ample supply of attention to give them. Fortunately, the purpose of marketing is to tell a story—one that compels people. Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have a match here... - - - 1. Assistant Project Manager Chris Creech helped me with the heavy lifting in gathering the publishing industry data used in this post. Thanks, Chris! Facilitating Storytelling on the WebNow that we're certain of the value of storytelling, the pressing question that remains is how to tell stories on the web. I don't think that the existence of the story is in question—every product or service's value can be expressed as a story. The difficulty is in framing that story for the people that you know need to hear it. Take some time to remind yourself of that story: What was the problem that you set out to solve? How did you find the solution? Why is your solution special? Why are things different now that you've solved the problem? It's a simple structure, but often one that eludes marketers who are sometimes too close to their product or service to see the story clearly. Once you're clear on the story, there are two things to focus on next: (1) Writing the story, and (2) making sure that your website supports that story. Storytelling Requires Good WritingI, and others at Newfangled, have written quite a bit about the value of writing and the discipline required to do it well. So rather than duplicate that here, let me briefly identify the key principles involved.
Enabling Storytelling with User InterfacesUser interface design decisions don't tell a story on their own, but they can certainly keep a story from being told. The most important thing to keep in mind when determining the functionality of a page is the page's core purpose. Every additional widget or call to action on a page should either directly support or at least not overshadow it's main point. Those that do not are more likely to distract your readers than help them focus. This seems obvious enough, but it's common to take a give-them-everything approach and overwhelm a page's sidebar with related content or calls to action in the hope that something there might engage a reader. A better approach would be to choose from a selection of options (calls to action or supporting content) the ones that best fits the persona for whom you've written the article on the page. Below are three examples of sites that I read from regularly that have mastered the art of keeping their article pages focused on the main content, though they take quite different approaches to layout.
While there's an obvious beauty to the minimalism of these pages (though I must say I secretly wish every article looked like their print-optimized versions), there is nothing wrong with finding ways to encourage readers to continue their sessions on your site. In fact, I've recently noticed a couple of new examples of user interfaces that encourage continued reading that are visually appealing, clever, and helpfully unobtrusive.
The New York Times quietly added a feature to their article pages which only appears once you reach the end of the article. By subtly appearing once your browser has reached the bottom of the page, this related content offer doesn't distract you from reading the article at all.
The Wall Street Journal, on the other hand, has built a related-content tool that is more browsing-oriented. Situated at the top of their article detail pages, their "top stories" ribbon allows you to scroll through related content rather than hunting for it in the standard navigation systems. Pep TalkSomeone once told me that good design gets out of the way of the message. Once a book has been written, those charged with designing the pages and cover take great care as to create a cover that sells the story and page layouts that simply supports the words. Any more visual attention to the inside would distract the reader. Web design should be the same, but we tend to take the opposite approach: designing and building websites before giving much thought to the content they will contain. Writing is clearly the first and most important part of telling your story. Even if your content strategy leans more heavily on audio or video than written content, writing still plays a major role in creating that material—articulating the purpose and plan for what is recorded and edited later. Without devoting considerable time toward writing, and investing in the structured work writing requires such that it becomes an established discipline at your firm, the value of your story will be lost. I hope we've provided some information and tools to help you along the way. Meanwhile, user interface trends are changing rapidly based upon new devices and evolving technologies. We must do our best to keep up with this change and be discerning about which shifts to act upon. I believe we're moving in a healthy direction toward simplicity, motivated less by style and more by what facilitates our stories to be told. After all, this web thing is a work in progress. |
If you're marketing on the web, storytelling is your best content strategy as everyone likes to read/watch/listen to new stories. Unfortunately, writing down stories worthy of the attention from others takes talent and/or time. It's nice to think that anyone can tell a good yarn, but we all know that some people can tell a joke at a party and get laughs while others get groans. Same goes for writing for the web.
Many of the businesses that we work with simply don't have the time (which is why they hire us). They have businesses to run, and hopefully, personal lives to get to at the end of the day. For them to drop everything and sit down to write a few well penned paragraphs (or make a three minute YouTube video of the story) would completely disrupt their workflow. And besides, that's not what they do best or have chosen to do with their time.
It would be nice to think that advocates of these non-mega businesses would create stories about them and post them on the web for free. This is the promise of the social web, and it does happen. But most of what I see currently happening on the social web is sharing of other people's stories, not the creation of new stories (unless the socializer is promoting their own content).
Bottom line for me - story tellers have always been a unique breed among the human race. Those that gain attention usually have an idea, the talent, the time, and the inclination to share their story with us. Their motivations are either fame or fortune. It is unlikely (but not impossible) that these non-mega brands can offer fame as a reward, so they need to offer fortune. And there is only so much fortune to go around.
Mark,
I think that this trend that Chris has brought up here represents a great opportunity for marketing firms. I agree with you that storytelling is a very difficult art, especially in marketing applications.
Agencies are in a great position to have a great deal of impact on their client's web sites through helping them with their online marketing content strategies.
Chris,
As I was reading this post, I began thinking about how I'd advise clients on applying the concept of storytelling on their site and the first, most obvious thing that came to mind are About pages. One trend I'm seeing are about pages that include historical timelines, and dig deep into the how the company has evolved to where it is today. 37 Signals does a particularly great job of this. Also, this UX Booth has some other about examples with a storytelling slant.
Thanks for another great newsletter.This will be a great topic for some of my upcoming TMS meetings.
Katie
Chris -- a well-written and pioneering treatise of storytelling on the web.
I feel the greatest challenge in storytelling is coming up with a story - it's not a systematic process. The storyline has to grow and evolve organically with readers.
You really don't where it's going to lead. And so the best we can do is provide editorial strategy and oversight.
Great post! I've specialized in writing and producing "creative non-fiction" for companies, brands, and products all over the world for TV, web, print, and live presentations. It works! The audience is more engaged. And the sales show the results.
Mark Shipley: You're right that time and funds are scarce, yet both needed to do this right. I probably didn't say it directly, but many companies won't be able to do this themselves for all the reasons you mention. But marketing firms (like yours) are ready, willing, and expert to do it for them.
Mark: Right on!
Katie: Great point! I can imagine many companies using their own "about" pages as brief, introductory exercises in telling their story online. Thanks for linking to the UX Booth article—they're a great resource, too.
Charles Bohannan: I think you're right—coming up with the story is certainly the most ambiguous task, one that I think many will struggle with more than they anticipate. But finding ways to exercise that thinking, whether by talking it out, writing it, or engaging in dialogue that can be transcribed, is essential to getting those creative juices (I can't believe I just wrote that) flowing.
Mike Brown: Cool—I'd love to hear more about your experiences.
Chris, very thoughtful piece. You've given me a ton to consider. One thing I'm curious about is how the story stands the test of time. You mention the pro's and con's of short and long form content, but even the long form stuff probably has a frequency level that might stretch any story thin. From what I can tell, the most active bloggers in my industry might post a few times a week, and those that write longer format stuff like whitepapers or newsletter pieces stick to a monthly or quarterly schedule. Either way, a lot of content! So how do we tell the story without just repeating ourselves at some point?
One of the best articles I've read in a long time!
Alex: What a great question. I think that the way your story can be told is by "small" stories that cumulatively tell the "big" one. If you think about it, the popular serial books and films take this approach too. The Harry Potter series, which I mentioned in the section on publishing industry data, is one grand story made up of seven smaller stories. While they progressively tell the tale of Harry and his Hogwarts friends, each book has a contained story of its own.
When you write for the web, it's similar: each article you write should be a contained thought that is satisfying to the reader even though it may be examining only one aspect of something critical to your story. For example, the Newfangled story is a fairly broad one that encompasses all kinds of concepts, so we can "zoom in" and write individual articles on design and development implementation, SEO, measurement, content strategy, and the like without veering off course, so to speak. All that said, repetition isn't necessarily a bad thing. Particularly with blogging, posts get buried over time, leaving you with the opportunity to rewrite or resurrect old posts. With our newsletters, we often repeat concepts, particularly if some technological change merits an update to that thought. I hope that helps!
Johanna: Thanks for the compliment! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
@mark shipley is right on in saying that not everyone can tell a story. It's not a matter of lack of opportunity, but lack of ability. Sorry to say, but true.
As for the abundance of sharing of other peoples' stories, well that's just because of the first point: most people consume rather than create. That's a society of people for you where few lead and most follow. And the stories that the masses hear/tell are about the very, very few.
Thanks for bringing the mass-discourse of the webtech world one step up, though. Most of what you read online, story or not, are weak attempts at creating new ideas. There's some fresh material here.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the findings on the second page yet. I was honestly shocked at what I saw there. (Of course, the charts are very pretty!) Had I been asked about our attention spans, especially as they pertain to books, I would definitely have thought we would be reading less in general. And when we do read, shorter material for sure.
As for the film and television statistics, it just would never have occurred to me to consider how much time we devote to particular narratives within that media. The idea that we watch too much TV is old hat, but the idea that we're watching TV much differently from how we watched a decade ago is much more relevant. What about your point about Lost? Fascinating! Their success in maintaining the interest of viewers for that long with one very complex story is - I think - unprecedented.
I'm sure I'll be thinking about this information quite a bit over the coming weeks - at least until your next article - and considering how to apply your insights to what I do.
enjoyable read. what would an example of a story in this context sound like? maybe a helpful part 2 would be a case study of this being done right?
I'm not a web developer, just a consumer and sometime generator of web content. Sorry writers, but I don't have the patience to read anymore. Give me a story via video - not too, too long - and I'm yours.
@judytrolley right on. Really enjoyed the book/movie/tv stats and found that whole portion a very helpful answer to all the fretting that's going on right now about "is Google making us stupid." Thanks for putting this together.
JackV: I think you're probably right that the majority of people in the world consume content rather than create it, but it's also certainly true that more people are creators today than ever before (at least in the context of creative/entertainment oriented economy).
Judy Trolley: I'm glad you found the research portion interesting. I found the story that came from it pretty compelling, too.
Kurt: That's a good question. I suppose the best example for me to identify would be our story and how we've told it using our site. I consider our newsletter and blog the primary way that I participate in telling our story directly, which, in its most basic form is that of a team of enthusiastic web professionals who work to remain, intellectually and practically, at the forefront of the industry and lead its clients over the course of a long-term business relationship. Within that story are the smaller stories that elaborate on our capabilities, or better said, our point of view on all the disciplines we employ in our work. The newsletter articles and blog content are the ongoing articulation of that point of view—what we think about how planning should work, how a CMS should work for users and developers, how the design process should work, what it means to develop good content, principles for testing and QA, how to nurture a website over the course of time after it launches, etc. A personal element comes to the story from all the different voices that participate in telling it—from those who work at Newfangled and write content and work with our clients. As far as a case study is concerned, I don't have one at the moment, but in a way, my post about how we redesigned our website early this year elaborates on the way we tell our story.
Coach Lowell: I hear you. I think there are still plenty of readers out there, and since SEO is still valuable to us and our clients, writing still has a significant place in our content strategy. But, I'd love to have more video content and find myself suggesting that for our clients as well. Now that YouTube has become a search engine on its own, having content there is even more important.
RLS: Glad you enjoyed it, too. On the "Is Google Making Us Stupid" note, Nicholas Carr recently did an interview that was recorded for FORA.tv that you can watch on Hulu. You might want to check that out.
Review of Brazil / Brazil Wheaton Glass Company / Storytellers:
This comment is meant to identify the applicability of the technique of storytelling in building the corporate memory. A systematic review was elaborated in the documents obtained from research in four databases, relating to the ways in which narratives were employed in building organizational memory. We conclude that narratives can be employed in the outsourcing and dissemination of tacit knowledge, and scientific literature indicates its use in communities of practice, case-based reasoning, learning histories, workshops and conversations.
We had some ideas to enrich a work to be presented in Congress with a case study in Wheaton. I understand that the "silver-hairs" of Wheaton are the memory of the organization, and until recently we asked whether their contribution was just to remember and tell stories. Recently, the answer came as clear as the mediator's role is fundamental and irreplaceable. A simple experiment is not enough, you need a mediator to explain and construct meaning, transfer culture and tradition.
We do not know a lot of applications in organizations, but for now it seems well suited to the work done by silver hairs or storytellers: the transmission of values, culture, creation of meanings, interpretation of reality. Even with all the knowledge explained, the mediators are still needed.
To fellow researchers and storytellers, are provided with the people here in Brazil to exchange experiences.
This topic speaks right to what seems to be major right now in advertising. We started off doing the whole "it's all about you" thing. Apple started it with the i___ convention, McDonald's "your way, right away," then YouTube, etc. The novelty of speaking to "me" has worn off, and now the message is richer and more subtly speaking to the individualism from before by creating those characters you mentioned. Great article!
Walter: That's interesting! You know, on a personal level, I've been thinking about how people really are the storage "media" for so many stories—stories we take for granted until the people who knew them are no longer with us, and the stories gone with them. We would benefit from having a way to preserve these stories. If it's as simple as passing them on by telling and remembering, that's great, but I'm sure some technologies could be used, too.
Angela: You're right- the way we speak to one another, whether casually or in the business/marketing context, needs to be flexible and evolve. Thanks for reading!